Nietzsche’s radical vision: beyond good and evil

There are few philosophers whose words still land like explosives, and Nietzsche remains one of them. He didn’t write to inform. He wrote to detonate — assumptions, illusions, pieties. He saw modern man not as enlightened but anaesthetised, clinging to moral certainties whose foundations had long since crumbled. And he wasn’t interested in replacing them with new ones. He wanted to know what would happen if we lived without them.

“God is dead,” he wrote. And while that line is endlessly quoted, its weight is often missed. Nietzsche wasn’t celebrating; he was mourning. Not the literal God, but the role He played — as source of value, order, purpose. With the death of that metaphysical anchor, Nietzsche foresaw a civilisation drifting into nihilism, grasping for meaning in a world that no longer guaranteed it. The collapse wasn’t future tense. It was already underway.

And it still is.

Today, we inhabit a moral landscape Nietzsche would recognise instantly: performative outrage posing as conviction, tribal obedience mistaken for ethics, the elevation of weakness to virtue, and the quiet, gnawing suspicion that none of it means anything. We swap gods for hashtags, dogma for dopamine, and tell ourselves we’re progressing. But progress, to Nietzsche, was not movement — it was becoming. And very few of us, he thought, were becoming anything at all.

He saw this coming: a culture allergic to difficulty, terrified of suffering, addicted to consensus. A culture that mistakes comfort for health. And he wanted to know what would happen when the scaffolding of inherited belief gave way. Would we crumble with it? Or would we finally begin the harder work: of creating values, not inheriting them? Of living intentionally, not obediently?

This is where Nietzsche becomes truly dangerous.

Because he doesn’t offer replacement ideologies. He doesn’t sell salvation. He asks whether we are strong enough — not physically, not politically, but existentially — to live without illusions. Can we bear the truth without collapsing into despair or distraction? Can we build a life worth repeating — not hypothetically, but endlessly, as his idea of eternal recurrence dares us to imagine?

Like where this is going? Get the next article straight to your inbox.

Subscribe and comment

Most of us live as if tomorrow will fix things. Nietzsche wanted to know if we’d still choose our lives if we had to live them again. Every awkward moment, every petty betrayal, every wasted day. If you flinch at the thought, he suggested, you might not be living honestly. And no system or story can do that work for you.

He called for the Übermensch — not a master race, but a master of self. A human being who transcends resentment, sheds borrowed morality, and lives by the values they’ve forged in fire. Not the easiest path, but the only one with dignity. Because the alternative, for Nietzsche, was servitude. Not to a tyrant, but to your own fear of freedom.

This is why Nietzsche still matters — because his challenge has never been more relevant, and never more ignored. We live in a world hyper-saturated with identity but starved of meaning. We curate selves we don’t inhabit. We outsource morality to institutions we neither trust nor challenge. We scream into the void and call it politics.

Nietzsche wouldn’t be surprised. He would be disappointed.

He believed that to live truthfully was to suffer — but to suffer for something. Not for status. Not for likes. But for the chance, however slim, of becoming something more than a product of your time. His vision wasn’t comforting. It wasn’t meant to be. It was meant to burn away the lies we wrap around ourselves like security blankets.

He didn’t want followers. He wanted flames.